Site Map Icon
RSS Feed icon
 
 
 
  Resources  
     
Did You Know?

APPOINTMENTS COVERED BY OUR UNION CONTRACT

are scheduled through Washington State's coordinating entity CTS LanguageLink. The contract performance measures are posted on HCA’s website

 

DSHS APPOINTMENTS

SFY2016                  16,782

SFY2015                  15,943

SFY2014                  15,556

Overall Filled Rate SFY 2015

91% Filled

HCA (Medicaid) APPOINTMENTS

SFY2016                     327,737

SFY2015                     282,636

SFY2014                     228,561

SFY2013                     201,576
SFY2012                     196,176

 HCA (Medicaid) BUDGET

Jul 2013/Jun 2015             $25.1M

Jul 2011/Jun 2013             $18.1M

Jul 2009/Jun 2011             $23.0M

 HCA (Medicaid) HOURLY RATE

July 2016                  $38.00

July 2015                  $37.10

July 2014                  $32.50
July 2013                  $32.00
July 2012                  $31.50
July 2011                  $30.00

FIRST UNION CONTRACT
        2010                  $21.00

A modified procurement model began on July 1, 2011

The coordinating entity procurement model began on September 24, 2012.

Get Txt Alerts
Sign up get breaking news from Interpreters United, Local 1671. Text L1671 to 237263. Data and message rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt-out. Reply HELP or contact txt@mcommons.com for help.
Privacy Policy/Terms and conditions

http://help.mcommons.com/help/sms/51

Remote Interpreting: Telephonic & Video
Updated On: Feb 23, 2014

What's happening with telephonic and video remote interpreting at medical Medicaid and DSHS appointments in Washington State?

Our 2011-2013 interpreter bargaining team negotiated the first-ever union rate of pay for spoken language interpreters providing services via telephonic and video remote modalities.  Check out the "know your rights" section of this website for more info on our union contract.

Learn more below about the history of our campaign to win standards for remote interpreting services that protect clients, ensure quality, and provide union-scale pay for interpreters.


Are you signed up with the State's vendor for DSHS and Medicaid appointments and want to start working from your home to provide remote interpreter services?

Sign up today with the State's vendor for DSHS and Medicaid appointments - CTS LanguageLink by sending the following information to hcainterpreters@ctslanguagelink.com: interpreter ID, first name, last name, phone number.  Read their VRI requirements and their video remote installation guide.   Contact them directly with further questions about how to get set up to accept jobs by video and telephone.   

You can also learn more by reading the IMIA's guide to telephonic interpreting for medical interpreters.


BACKGROUND

Health Care Authority (HCA) manages an Interpreter Services Program for DSHS and Meidcaid enrollee medical appointments.  While the State has used telephonic interpreters for social services appointments for years, all medical appointments for Medicaid enrollees used in-person interpreters only.  In January 2010 the State suddenly proposed moving to 80% telephonic and video remote interpreting as a cost-savings measure.  At the time, the State was spending over 42% in administrative costs.  

We successfully advocated in the Legislature to mandate reductions in administrative costs before riskly moving almost entirely to telephonic or video remote. 

The Legislature required the Health Care Authority (HCA) to "identify the circumstances under which it is appropriate to use telephonic or video remote interpreting".  Hundreds of concerned medical providers, interpreters, and citizens emailed the State with recommendations for these guidelines.  But in December 2011, HCA released preliminary "Interpreting Screening Guidelines" that appeared to ignore months of input from stakeholders and subject area experts - even federal CLAS guidelines. 

The preliminary guidelines stated that "telephonic interpretation is the default modality to be utilized for interpreter services medical appointments, followed by video remote and in-person" and the requirement that healthcare providers submit a signed written statement to choose a non-telephonic mode of interpreter services delivery.  The proposed screening guidelines would have gone into effect June 2012 after HCA finished a bidding process to select a new scheduling entity for delivering interpreter services.

Highlights from HCA's December 2011 proposal:

  • Allow the interpreter scheduler to decide based on cost whether phone, video or in-person is most appropriate - unless a health care provider submits a written request otherwise.
  • The state is NOT planning to require that medical providers meet minimum international equipment standards for telephonic and video remote interpreting.
  • The state is NOT planning to limit the types of appointments that will move to phone or video.  Despite ALL major hospitals using such exceptions to protect patients and their own liability!

HCA's proposal to move primarily to telephonic interpreting went against the recommendation of doctors, hospitals, patient advocates, and interpreters that HCA continue using in-person interpreters, with telephonic and video interpreting available as a supplemental system.  We had serious concerns that Medicaid healthcare providers would instead drop out of the Medicaid provider network, further jeopardizing access to health care for all Washington residents.

Other organizations joined Interpreters United in expressing concerns to HCA.  Read supporting letters from organizations to HCA: 

After a series of meetings, and hundreds of telephone calls and emails from union members and concerned citizens, HCA decided to leave it up to requestors to choose - at the time of the initial request - which modality to request. 

While this was welcome news to interpreters, medical providers, and patient advocates, our Union is still concerned that HCA is not going to have basic equipment guidelines before authorizing medical staff to request telephonic or video interpreters.

Many questions remain about the State's current plan for remote interpreting services.  There are serious consequences to the use of improper equipment to provide remote interpreter services, but remote technologies also offer an opportunity to increase acecss to healthcare for people in rural areas or who speak languages of lesser diffusion.

  • Why does HCA assume telephonic interpreting will be cheaper than other modes in all scenarios when academic research suggests in-person interpreters are more cost-effective in some scenarios?
  • How will the 12-15,000 Medicaid healthcare providers in Washington state afford new equipment and training?
  • How will providers in rural areas learn about the option to receive interpreter services via remote technologies?  

Our Union continues to work with the State, their vendor CTS LanguageLink, and professional associations on educating medical providers on the equipment and training needed for various modalities.


Upcoming Events
Policy Committee Meeting
Jul 24, 2017
TBD by WFSE
Local 1671 Ethics Workshop & Statewide Meeting Elections for Convention Delegates
Aug 05, 2017
Puyallup Public Library 324 S Meridian, Puyallup, WA 98371
UMCC
Sep 13, 2017
Olympia
WFSE Family Campout
Sep 17, 2017
Camp Delaney at Sun Lakes/Dry Falls State Park
International Translator Day - Feast of St. Jerome
Sep 30, 2017
Worldwide
Need an interpreter?

How to hire an interpreter or translator

Get resources for working with interpreters here.

Member Login
Username:

Password:

Forgot Your Login?
Site Search
Site Map
RSS Feeds
 
 
Interpreters United
Copyright © 2017, All Rights Reserved.
Powered By UnionActive™
Visit Unions-America.com!

Top of Page image